Partnership in a Time of Pandemic: The CEO and the Board BoardSource consultant Ann Cohen addresses how the constructive partnership between the board and the professional shifts in times of crisis, and offers questions and insights to guide you with your next steps. Grounded in your school’s mission, this article articulates what “being in this together” looks like.
Governance & Crisis: The Board's Role Learn how “productive paranoia” can be an asset in planning during crisis. Drawing on lessons from the book Great by Choice: Uncertainty, Chaos, and Luck—Why Some Thrive Despite Them All, by Jim Collins and Morten T. Hansen, the authors of this blog explore how thinking about all the things that can go wrong is actually a competitive advantage and offer insight into practices school leaders and trustees should engage in to secure their schools in crisis and beyond.
A Recipe for Thriving in Uncertain Times Donna Orem, President of the National Association of Independent Schools, provides a step-by-step guide to questions to ask around scenario planning.
COVID-19 Generative Governance-- Board Guidelines from Dr. Richard Chait (podcast) Key Takeaways: Should boards be governing differently in times of crisis, particularly now? If it is not business as usual for schools, it is not business as usual for boards. - Work with discipline—both individually and collectively. Crisis is a time for collective deliberation, consensus-driven decisions, and the discipline to speak with a single voice, especially in the face of unpopular or controversial decisions.
- Focus simultaneously on short- and long-term decisions. Boards should agree on what to decide collectively and get the questions right in the near term while also thinking about generative questions for the long term—those all-important “what-if” questions.
- Set aside the conventional committee structure for the next 9 to 12 months and instead organize the board into two teams. One would work with the administration on urgent fiduciary issues and be consultants, not managers. The second would have a long-term focus, serving like a think tank to discern and frame generative questions. These two teams would ensure that board structure aligns with both short- and long-term challenges.
Chait suggests that the board needs to hold the tension between continuity and transformation: “Insight resides at the intersection of paradoxes. Schools need to have the conversation on whether they want school to be the same as before the crisis. If not, what do they hope to change? If they hope to change, what is the theory of change? How do they think change happens? How did the school culture and values fare during the crisis? Have disruptions disclosed better ways to educate? Or more efficient ways to operate?” |